TechCrunch has an interesting item about struggling phone operator Vonage testing a device gateway that blogger Michael Arrington likens to Ooma’s hardware solution for voice-over-IP phone service. Ooma’s box lets people make unlimited domestic phone calls once they’ve purchased its box. Vonage is signing up beta customers to test the device. What isn’t clear yet is what business model Vonage might build around these gateways. Is it considering some sort of one-time, hardware based model like Ooma, one which would potentially cannibalize its existing subscription-based model? Or does it see the new gateway as a premium product for which it could charge its customers extra? Either way, Vonage CEO Jeffrey Citron probably is asking himself some hard questions in the wake of SunRocket’s demise and an ongoing patent battle with Verizon (VZ). As a pioneer in VOIP, he surely has taken notice of the excitement Ooma is generating among tech types - the same people who thought Vonage was so innovative three or four years ago. Now Vonage (VG) is considered a mainstream product, not cutting edge. And Ooma? The thing most non-techies probably know about Ooma is that its creative director is a guy named Ashton Kutcher, an actor who is married to Demi Moore. While Vonage’s foray into Ooma territory doesn’t require the addition of a celebrity creative director, we hear Kutcher’s That 70’s Show costar Wilmer Valderrama is available for corporate gigs. Posted by stephaniemehta 12:06 pm 4 Comments
The Vonage device is just a router, nothing at all like that big honkin’ Ooma thing that’s worth more as a doorstop than a VOIP device. Posted By Michael Feld, New York, NY : August 6, 2007 10:31 am
It’s just a very good router. Nothing to do with Ooma. Posted By Charlie Sahner, Holmdel, NJ : August 3, 2007 3:42 pm
When you write about “the excitement Ooma is generating among tech types”, you should realize that the (positive) excitement about OOMA is among those who know little about the technology involved. Those who understand the technology (of the phone lines and network it has to use to terminate calls) realize that it can’t work, since it is based on technical impossibilities, not to mention that it requires the use of residential phone lines in a way that is a violation of the use’s service agreement with the phone company (letting other unknown people use their line). Posted By Mike Pierce, Kingsville, MD : August 3, 2007 1:11 pm
To send a letter to the editor about The Browser: Analyzing the tech biz, click here. CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
|
|
I liked the ads too. But why didn’t they spend their money on the rights to their technology? It’s discouraging — first Sunrocket going broke then this. Net2Phone and Lingo, they say, has financial backing. That’s a start.