CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market trading After-hours trading Winners/losers/actives Bonds Currencies Commodities Money Magazine Retirement Mutual Funds Taxes Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Loan Center Best Places to Live Calculators Mortgage Rates Personal tech Big Tech blog Techland blog Sectors and stocks Fortune 500 techs Tech Talk 100 best places to launch Ultimate resource guide Small biz makeovers FSB 100 Ask & Answer Fortune 500 Technology Investing Management Rankings Main Create portfolio Edit portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts

The mainstream media spin on l’affaire Imus seems to be that blogs and websites can take credit for his demise. The Wall Street Journal (sub. required) on page one says a “digital brush fire” spurred the firing: “…the lucrative and often vulgar business of talk radio found itself running into new limits, as the Internet set Mr. Imus to millions of PC screens….”

Hard-working New York Times media columnist David Carr makes a similar observation, noting, as did the Journal, that watchdogs Media Matters for America played a big role in disseminating Imus’ comments online.

The Browser was all set to pooh-pooh this theory: It seems to us that Don Imus was done in by, well, Don Imus. Web or no web, his comments would have been grounds for dismissal.

But then we reread New York Times op-ed columnist Bob Herbert’s piece (sub. required) recounting an Imus appearance on “60 Minutes” in 1998.

According to Herbert’s column, Mike Wallace called Imus on his passing use of the dreaded N word. Imus denied using the word, but his producer confirmed the vulgarity. Imus then tried to suggest the comment was off the record.

Herbert’s well-taken point is that Imus has a long history of bad behavior on racial issues. Our point is this: That the piece aired on television in 1998, and caused barely a ripple. Had YouTube been around back then, perhaps Imus wouldn’t have been on the air eight years later taking trash about the basketball-playing women of Rutgers.

Filed under Uncategorized
Posted by stephaniemehta 1:59 pm 15 Comments comment | Add a comment

I think probably what got Imus in trouble this time was WHO he was insulting. For example, had Imus called Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton something along the lines of nappy-headed gigolos, he would still have a job right now. However, he instead decided to pick on a hard-working, innocent, women’s college basketball team. In other words, Imus’ stupidity got him fired more than his ignorance.

I’d be interested to know WHO Imus has insulted in the past, just to compare to today’s reaction.

Posted By Peter Hooper, Greensboro, NC : April 16, 2007 9:01 am

Blogs and the Internet are irrelevant to Mr. Imus when Reverends Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton come into play.

When a guy says he will “detoxify the airwaves” and is invited into the boardroom meeting on whether or not to fire Imus, he’s PRETTY MUCH been put in charge if you ask me.

Why should the networks listen to Sharpton and Jackson? Why should they have more power than anyone else? The whole of the listening community is affected here, not just two disenfranchised and obviously biased men who’re infamous throughout the media for spreading wildfires over minor offenses.

The whole affair, as you put it, is ridiculous to begin with and was handled outrageously. Of course, it’s ultimately up to the network’s decision whether or not to fire, but maybe a better second opinion should have been consulted.

Besides, why should Imus be fired when people like Rush Limbaugh are still on the air?

Posted By holyjaw : April 15, 2007 2:41 pm

don imus made a racial statement. nbc took a stand on that for whatever easin (most likely money) i think hi statement and his employer are the ones that made the decision. also aby one that had access to mass public media (like tv)

Posted By abetteryou : April 15, 2007 9:37 am

The Imus debacle is a great indicator that it’s a new world. There’s a bigger battle here - the battle between old world and new world (not just in media but in every other area of life). Imus was part of an old guard that did things it’s way. In the new world, things will be done with a global perspective. One word spoken recklessly will be heard down under within seconds. A simple article posted on a blog is immediately available in the remotest villages of the world (provided there’s internet!). It’s a new world!

Posted By Herman Najoli : April 15, 2007 6:20 am

It’s a nice story that blogging is helping the democratic process to deliver the leaders we deserve. Google’s investment in Utube seems increasingly a far-sighted one.

This makes and efforts to censor the content and global reach of these innovative media even more signficant.

Posted By Tudor : April 15, 2007 1:33 am

The Don Imus incident is just the crushing blow that will provoke ignorant America to begin the methodical stripping of the first amendment from our constitution.

Don Imus never commanded any respect, had no credibility, and always was a jerkwad from the beginning, however, men have died so that we retain the freedom of speech in this country. Don Imus doesn’t have to be liked, but he is an American and he has the freedom of speech.

Fire Don Imus for being an idiot (which should have happened 30 years ago in his first year on the air) but not because the self-appointed patriarch, reverend wannabe, Al Sharpton spearheaded a rally against a slur that is commonplace and accepted in the black community of America both in the rap/hiphop/urban music and the language. Whoopie Goldberg could have named her production company “One Nappy Headed Ho Productions” and no one would have said a thing, just as One Ho Prouctions, doesn’t bother anyone. Don Imus could create “Hillbilly Cracker Productions” and no one would care.
Al Sharpton did his usual grandstanding again to get his name in the main stream media once more on a self-absorbed creation of righteousness, and the spineless, ignorant America took the bait once again.

Posted By Scott Wolf, Pittsburgh, Pa. : April 14, 2007 11:56 pm

Folks sure have embraced the bad habit of finger-pointing. But you’re absolutely right, Imus did Imus in. Well, Imus and his enemies, which obviously outnumber his friends.

Posted By Lance : April 14, 2007 9:57 pm

It’s transparently obvious that what tipped the balance for Imus was Procter & Gamble’s decision to cancel their advertising. Once that happened, the dominoes just fell one by one. So as much as self-congratulatory bloggers would like to take the credit for this, it really belongs to one of the most megalithic of corporate megaliths.

Posted By xfrosch : April 14, 2007 9:00 pm

Don Imus was done in by celebrity “pastors” who could not not forgive. How ironic!

Posted By yousha Gilbert, Az : April 14, 2007 7:19 pm

fascist blog that doesn’t allow comments. you best start allowing comments before i get al sharpton on you!

Posted By jesse jackson : April 14, 2007 6:52 pm

Imus will be back, count on it. I can’t wait!

Posted By Zeke, NY, NY : April 14, 2007 6:48 pm

“Nappy” is not a racist word. It describes the uncombed condition of ANYONE’s hair. Also “ho” is not racist. Ho is just an abbreviation of “whore” and “whore” certainly has nothing to do with race! The media characterization of this as a racial slur show the media’s absolute stupidity and the media’s racism against white people. It was a mean-spirited comment, but certainly not racist! Especially since there are WHITE women on the Rutgers team! A big DOH and apology is due Imus from the media, but it will never happen because they are the true racists.

Posted By joe smoe, houtson tx : April 14, 2007 4:39 pm

You have certanily made a good point. While the blogs and technology today is powerful though, I did mention in my own blog that he should have thought before he spoke. He certainly didn’t have a parent who harped on this during his upbringing; otherwise, he wouldn’t be going down this path now (or, perhaps, he had forgotten that he was supposed to think before he spoke). What ever the case might be, I do tire of the folks who lash out with comments like Imus’s. I don’t care whether it was on the broadcast or not. It should have never been spoken even if it were his thoughts.

Posted By txbluebonnet : April 14, 2007 10:12 am

Sorry. The blogosphere did not do Don Imus in, the so called Reverend Al Sharpton and the mainstream media did that thankyou. I personally wrote several pieces over a two day period about Imus in his defense. Short and sweet…did he say something reprehensible? Yes. Has he been doing it for years? Yes!The real outrage here is the hipocracy of MSNBC, CBS Radio, and Al Sharpton & Jessie Jackson. Where is their outrage toward rappers, and certain comedians on television who get away with making racial comments all the time? Kiss your free speech goodby!

Posted By Lew Newmark, Middletown,NY : April 14, 2007 8:26 am

Imus was done in by Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, two men of the cloth that do not understand the meaning of forgivness.

Until they take on the black rap artists that say even worse things about black woman than they will be seen as hypercritical at the least

Posted By tsolum : April 14, 2007 1:51 am

To send a letter to the editor about The Browser: Analyzing the tech biz, click hereTop of page

Got a news tip? Send it to The Browser


© 2008 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. All Times are ET.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Hemscott.
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.