CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market trading After-hours trading Winners/losers/actives Bonds Currencies Commodities Money Magazine Retirement Mutual Funds Taxes Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Loan Center Best Places to Live Calculators Mortgage Rates Personal tech Big Tech blog Techland blog Sectors and stocks Fortune 500 techs Tech Talk 100 best places to launch Ultimate resource guide Small biz makeovers FSB 100 Ask & Answer Fortune 500 Technology Investing Management Rankings Main Create portfolio Edit portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts

The latest search market share numbers are in from Hitwise: in the four weeks ended March 31st, Google (GOOG) racked up fully 64.13% of all US searches. That’s up more than 10% since March 2006, and, if trends hold, Google’s share will pass the two thirds mark by August. In the same period, Yahoo (YHOO), Microsoft (MSFT), and Ask (IACI) all lost share. As the old Wall Street hands like to say: “Liquidity begets liquidity.”

Clearly, this is not good news for the search also rans, particularly as it covers a period when all of them made major and costly improvements to their search engines. Ask.com for example, rolled out an impressive local search service in 2006 and also greatly improved its image searching, and yet its share declined nearly a half a point, to a fragile 3.48%, in the course of the year.

Conventional wisdom has long held that Google is vulnerable to vertical attacks, i.e. search engines that carve out category niches. The new Hitwise data suggests, however, that Google is actually gaining influence in valuable verticals. Search engines overall grew in influence over the year, accounting for more of the total traffic sent to sites in the categories of travel, health, shopping, business, and entertainment, among others. However, in all of those categories, the growth of Google’s share of this “upstream traffic” flow outpaced that of its rivals. In shopping, for example, Google’s share grew 14% while, taken together, all search engines increased their share in that arena by only 6%.

Of course, web market share numbers are notoriously fallible, and these will require further vetting. Meantime, those desperate for any sign of Google weakness, may take some consolation in this recent PC Magazine critique of Gmail. Delighted GOOG investors wishing to further fuel their warm and fuzzy feelings, on the other hand, should proceed directly to Alex Iskold’s two-by-two matrix-laden proof that Google is, in fact, the “ultimate money making machine.”

Filed under Ask.com, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo
Posted by oliverryan 12:51 pm 8 Comments comment | Add a comment

I liked Google much better without the local search. I liked the idea of being in the top ten to get on the first page of results. Now, my website http://www.yourfreshstart.us need to be in the top seven after 3 local searches appear. It took 3 months to get the search “tucson House Cleaning Service” on the first page. It hung out at 8/9/10 it seemed forever. However, they send me 2/3 my my inique visitors so I’m Okay with them… You can’t have everything.

Posted By Tucson, AZ : May 7, 2007 2:28 am

Nothing surprising? considering they are earning 30 a click….and all those strategy. oh man, they are up to date+ come with such simplicity. who can argue. http://betonbetts.wordpress.com see site for some interesting googol facts

Posted By betonbetts : April 12, 2007 11:06 am

Actually, I hardly see any ads compared to yahoo or msn.

Posted By Zach, Lafayette, IN : April 12, 2007 7:53 am

I dont like the idea of monopoly, we all become prey of one cmpany agenda [in this case serch algorithm] which favors one type of strctured interest over the another. so I am not getting the anwers I want , but rather the answers Google wants me to recieve …. not good parity of the search market must prevails…

Posted By offshelf.net : April 12, 2007 3:38 am

Other search sites are also increasing their influence. An example is http://www.goodsearch.com - a search site that donates money to our favourite charities for every search we do on that site.

Posted By Ajith SRN, Coimbatore, India : April 11, 2007 11:12 pm

its nice to know that google isnt fully dominating all of the searches. There is still room to compete.

Posted By boldtech : April 11, 2007 8:42 pm

drmike

Ha…I challenge you to show us a better search engine than google.

Posted By captian over, canada : April 11, 2007 6:58 pm

But yet, Google’s search returns seem to be filled with spam and other crud and reports never seem to get resolved. Hmmm, why is that? Could it be they’re more interested in their Adsense program and making money for their investors instead of providing the proper search results that they said was their aim?

Posted By drmike : April 11, 2007 6:16 pm

To send a letter to the editor about The Browser: Analyzing the tech biz, click hereTop of page

Got a news tip? Send it to The Browser


© 2008 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. All Times are ET.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Hemscott.
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.